CommodoresPlus

Slowly picking up the pieces of this thread in the aftermath of Photobucket 

Over the past couple of years have come to understand the cam scope (combustion phasing) with VVT a lot more.

Penny dropped for me firstly to think in terms of advertised @ 0.006” vs 0.050” silliness, then not to think in terms of static Duration or Lobe Se…[Read more]

Slowly picking up the pieces of this thread in the aftermath of Photobucket 

Over the past couple of years have come to understand the cam scope (combustion phasing) with VVT a lot more.

Penny dropped for me firstly to think in terms of advertised @ 0.006” vs 0.050” silliness, then not to think in terms of static Duration or Lobe Se…[Read more]

Slowly picking up the pieces of this thread in the aftermath of Photobucket 

Over the past couple of years have come to understand the cam scope (combustion phasing) with VVT a lot more.

Penny dropped for me firstly to think in terms of advertised @ 0.006” vs 0.050” silliness, then not to think in terms of static Duration or Lobe Se…[Read more]

Slowly picking up the pieces of this thread in the aftermath of Photobucket 

Over the past couple of years have come to understand the cam scope (combustion phasing) with VVT a lot more.

Penny dropped for me firstly to think in terms of advertised @ 0.006” vs 0.050” silliness, then not to think in terms of static Duration or Lobe Se…[Read more]

Slowly picking up the pieces of this thread in the aftermath of Photobucket 

Over the past couple of years have come to understand the cam scope (combustion phasing) with VVT a lot more.

Penny dropped for me firstly to think in terms of advertised @ 0.006” vs 0.050” silliness, then not to think in terms of static Duration or Lobe Se…[Read more]

Slowly picking up the pieces of this thread in the aftermath of Photobucket 

Over the past couple of years have come to understand the cam scope (combustion phasing) with VVT a lot more.

Penny dropped for me firstly to think in terms of advertised @ 0.006” vs 0.050” silliness, then not to think in terms of static Duration or Lobe Se…[Read more]

Slowly picking up the pieces of this thread in the aftermath of Photobucket 

Over the past couple of years have come to understand the cam scope (combustion phasing) with VVT a lot more.

Penny dropped for me firstly to think in terms of advertised @ 0.006” vs 0.050” silliness, then not to think in terms of static Duration or Lobe Se…[Read more]

Slowly picking up the pieces of this thread in the aftermath of Photobucket 

Over the past couple of years have come to understand the cam scope (combustion phasing) with VVT a lot more.

Penny dropped for me firstly to think in terms of advertised @ 0.006” vs 0.050” silliness, then not to think in terms of static Duration or Lobe Se…[Read more]

Slowly picking up the pieces of this thread in the aftermath of Photobucket 

Over the past couple of years have come to understand the cam scope (combustion phasing) with VVT a lot more.

Penny dropped for me firstly to think in terms of advertised @ 0.006” vs 0.050” silliness, then not to think in terms of static Duration or Lobe Se…[Read more]

Slowly picking up the pieces of this thread in the aftermath of Photobucket 

Over the past couple of years have come to understand the cam scope (combustion phasing) with VVT a lot more.

Penny dropped for me firstly to think in terms of advertised @ 0.006” vs 0.050” silliness, then not to think in terms of static Duration or Lobe Se…[Read more]

Slowly picking up the pieces of this thread in the aftermath of Photobucket 

Over the past couple of years have come to understand the cam scope (combustion phasing) with VVT a lot more.

Penny dropped for me firstly to think in terms of advertised @ 0.006” vs 0.050” silliness, then not to think in terms of static Duration or Lobe Se…[Read more]

Maybe 

Not debate but hear me out for a sec: What makes the ban offensive to most of the member base is (as pointed out by almost 100 members in 12 hours), that the banter between me and my friend on the thread was never abusive, he feels terrible this happened and not had the same treatment.

Imogenr  (retired ole fuddy sha…[Read more]

Maybe 

Not debate but hear me out for a sec: What makes the ban offensive to most of the member base is (as pointed out by almost 100 members in 12 hours), that the banter between me and my friend on the thread was never abusive, he feels terrible this happened and not had the same treatment.

Imogenr  (retired ole fuddy sha…[Read more]

Maybe 

Not debate but hear me out for a sec: What makes the ban offensive to most of the member base is (as pointed out by almost 100 members in 12 hours), that the banter between me and my friend on the thread was never abusive, he feels terrible this happened and not had the same treatment.  Not Clair but Imogenr  the ret…[Read more]

Maybe 

Not debate but hear me out for a sec: What makes the ban offensive to most of the member base is (as pointed out by almost 100 members in 12 hours), that the banter between me and my friend on the thread was never abusive, he feels terrible this happened and not had the same treatment.  Not Clair but Imogenr  the ret…[Read more]

Maybe 

Not debate but hear me out for a sec: What makes the ban offensive to most of the member base is (as pointed out by almost 100 members in 12 hours), that the banter between me and my friend on the thread was never abusive, he feels terrible this happened and not had the same treatment.  Not Clair but Imogenr :whistle: the ret…[Read more]

Maybe 

Not debate but please hear me out: What makes the ban offensive to most of the member base is (as pointed out by almost 100 members in 12 hours), that the banter between me and my friend on the thread was never abusive, he feels terrible this happened and not had the same treatment.  Not Clair but Imogenr :whistle: the ret…[Read more]