LSA super charged create motor

[Judge1 FrazerParticipant new zealand1983 VB LSA MG9 6060 6 speed View build HERE Member since: February 5, 2016 Posts: 775]

This reply has been reported for inappropriate content.

Cheers lj did you use your existing accessories or did you source other ones if so where from and what ecu are you running  thanks

[Anonymous View build HERE Member since: January 1, 1970 Posts: 0]

I built mine on an L98 base before the LSA’s were available as Crate engines, added a stroker kit and a Harrop Stealth Force Blower, Blower cost the same as the LSA so they’re the deal of the decade and you get a much better developed base engine!

E38 ECU, they’re boost capable from the factory so no real need for anything more sophisticated/expensive.

[Judge1 FrazerParticipant new zealand1983 VB LSA MG9 6060 6 speed View build HERE Member since: February 5, 2016 Posts: 775]

Thanks that a lot of work on the motor is your build on here or s/c

[Anonymous View build HERE Member since: January 1, 1970 Posts: 0]

Here ya go>>

AWD-T3-VR Lexcen

[cava454Moderator 93 VR BT1 View build HERE Member since: February 20, 2015 Posts: 2 390]

Crate motor.

 

The zl1 lid is better. It has a better “Brick” so the cooling capacity is nicer. A different lid looks uglier (IMO) and well costs more money.

[Anonymous View build HERE Member since: January 1, 1970 Posts: 0]

The CTS-V Lid has the bulge to the rear so a better fit in a Commodore..

[cava454Moderator 93 VR BT1 View build HERE Member since: February 20, 2015 Posts: 2 390]

Yes. Correct it does fit better. But it has less of a cooling capacity. Cost more money and IMO looks uglier.

 

I rather her a small scoop personally.

[sands vsParticipant vs commodore View build HERE Member since: March 1, 2015 Posts: 619]

Judge1 Frazer wrote:

Hey sands is that the car your doing that look great ,

 

No mate its not mine its a customers car at mkal automotive just thought the pics would help see what they have done and whats involved..  I have a vs commodore

[VRSenator065Participant Adelaide SAVR Senator LSx454 1960 Kombi (project) 1921 Nash Hot Rod (future project) View build HERE Member since: February 17, 2015 Posts: 5 777]

I personally think all the LSA configs are a bit ugly.  If its looks your going for imo they aren’t the way to go, but then that may not be an issue.

[Judge1 FrazerParticipant new zealand1983 VB LSA MG9 6060 6 speed View build HERE Member since: February 5, 2016 Posts: 775]

Hey all I read on another page that these motor (LSA) have three map sensors this surely can not be right , would a 3bar map sensor  be enough, if any one can give me more info would be appreciated

also I’ve looked at custom wiring looms and they say they add diagnostic plug and oxygen sensors ,don’t the ls1 come with this wired in ???? Cheers Frazer

[cava454Moderator 93 VR BT1 View build HERE Member since: February 20, 2015 Posts: 2 390]

Yes, 3 map sensors.

It’s honestly easier and only slightly more expensive to stick with the FBW and go either e38 or e67 ECU.

If you want flex fuel e38.

[Slow355Participant Victoriahectic spec 355 vs ss ute View build HERE Member since: March 2, 2015 Posts: 322]

When you have 600hp and running tens with fuck all work who cares how ugly the motor is lol. LSA is definitely the way if you want to engine swap.

munch munch ls1s for lunch
Best 1/4 mile 13.1@105mph 60ft-1.8sec Reaction time .8 sec 0/100-4.8sec

[VRSenator065Participant Adelaide SAVR Senator LSx454 1960 Kombi (project) 1921 Nash Hot Rod (future project) View build HERE Member since: February 17, 2015 Posts: 5 777]

LSx454, 600 plus HP, 600 ft/lb, NA, straight out the box.  LSA isnt the only way to go.  Not saying LSA is a bad way to go btw, just saying there are other options.

[cava454Moderator 93 VR BT1 View build HERE Member since: February 20, 2015 Posts: 2 390]

It’s the smart way to go. Lol

[Slow355Participant Victoriahectic spec 355 vs ss ute View build HERE Member since: March 2, 2015 Posts: 322]

VRSenator065 wrote:

LSx454, 600 plus HP, 600 ft/lb, NA, straight out the box. LSA isnt the only way to go. Not saying LSA is a bad way to go btw, just saying there are other options.

Yea and a few bolt on tweaks the lsa making 700hp. Like all blown/turbo stock motors, heaps left in them without going heads and cams etc

munch munch ls1s for lunch
Best 1/4 mile 13.1@105mph 60ft-1.8sec Reaction time .8 sec 0/100-4.8sec

[VRSenator065Participant Adelaide SAVR Senator LSx454 1960 Kombi (project) 1921 Nash Hot Rod (future project) View build HERE Member since: February 17, 2015 Posts: 5 777]

Slow355 wrote:

VRSenator065 wrote:

LSx454, 600 plus HP, 600 ft/lb, NA, straight out the box. LSA isnt the only way to go. Not saying LSA is a bad way to go btw, just saying there are other options.

Yea and a few bolt on tweaks the lsa making 700hp. Like all blown/turbo stock motors, heaps left in them without going heads and cams etc

My LSx is probably making around 630ish, with a very baby cam and zero mods.  Cam change and head tickle I will be around 700 too with instant throttle response and huge low down torque and none of the complication (visual and mechanical) of FI.  It just comes down to personal preference. Both work, both are great, LSA just isn’t the only game in town.

[cava454Moderator 93 VR BT1 View build HERE Member since: February 20, 2015 Posts: 2 390]

Each has their perks. I’ve done the NA deal and Cbf with it again. Thus why I went boosted.

I want to make 700rwhp not Fly.

[VRSenator065Participant Adelaide SAVR Senator LSx454 1960 Kombi (project) 1921 Nash Hot Rod (future project) View build HERE Member since: February 17, 2015 Posts: 5 777]

For sure, no right/wrong way.  My eventual end goal is/was 1,000hp fly NA, but that is maybe 750 + 250 hp nos which is sorta a bit like chemical fi.  Not sure what that would equate too at the wheels.  So what sort of numbers on the 1/4 would that theoretically give you Cav, low 9’s?

[cava454Moderator 93 VR BT1 View build HERE Member since: February 20, 2015 Posts: 2 390]

Ive never been one for RWKW. I just want it to run 145mph. Hopefully around 9.5-9.8

so I prob shouldn’t of said 700rwhp lol.

• This reply was modified 8 years, 5 months ago by  cava454.

[Slow355Participant Victoriahectic spec 355 vs ss ute View build HERE Member since: March 2, 2015 Posts: 322]

But the way cav eats will probably be more like 10 flat with his lard ass in it

munch munch ls1s for lunch
Best 1/4 mile 13.1@105mph 60ft-1.8sec Reaction time .8 sec 0/100-4.8sec

[Author]

Posts