HomeForumsTechnical – GeneralDrivelineLSA super charged create motor

This topic contains 59 replies, has 7 voices, and was last updated by Profile photo of Judge1 Frazer Judge1 Frazer 6 years, 8 months ago.

Viewing 20 posts - 21 through 40 (of 61 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #14460
    Profile photo of Judge1 Frazer
    Judge1 Frazer
    Participant
    Member since: February 5, 2016
    Posts: 775
    Supporter

    This reply has been reported for inappropriate content.

    Cheers lj did you use your existing accessories or did you source other ones if so where from and what ecu are you running  thanks

    #14462
    Profile photo of
    Anonymous Member since: January 1, 1970
    Posts: 0

    I built mine on an L98 base before the LSA’s were available as Crate engines, added a stroker kit and a Harrop Stealth Force Blower, Blower cost the same as the LSA so they’re the deal of the decade and you get a much better developed base engine!

    E38 ECU, they’re boost capable from the factory so no real need for anything more sophisticated/expensive.

    #14463
    Profile photo of Judge1 Frazer
    Judge1 Frazer
    Participant
    Member since: February 5, 2016
    Posts: 775
    Supporter

    Thanks that a lot of work on the motor is your build on here or s/c

    #14464
    Profile photo of
    Anonymous Member since: January 1, 1970
    Posts: 0

    Here ya go>>

    AWD-T3-VR Lexcen

    #14471
    Profile photo of cava454
    cava454
    Moderator
    Member since: February 20, 2015
    Posts: 2 390
    Supporter

    Crate motor.

     

    The zl1 lid is better. It has a better “Brick” so the cooling capacity is nicer. A different lid looks uglier (IMO) and well costs more money.

    #14478
    Profile photo of
    Anonymous Member since: January 1, 1970
    Posts: 0

    The CTS-V Lid has the bulge to the rear so a better fit in a Commodore..

    #14494
    Profile photo of cava454
    cava454
    Moderator
    Member since: February 20, 2015
    Posts: 2 390
    Supporter

    Yes. Correct it does fit better. But it has less of a cooling capacity. Cost more money and IMO looks uglier.

     

    I rather her a small scoop personally.

    #14498
    Profile photo of sands vs
    sands vs
    Participant
    Member since: March 1, 2015
    Posts: 619

    Hey sands is that the car your doing that look great ,

     

    No mate its not mine its a customers car at mkal automotive just thought the pics would help see what they have done and whats involved..  I have a vs commodore

    #14500
    Profile photo of VRSenator065
    VRSenator065
    Participant
    • Adelaide SA
    • VR Senator LSx454 1960 Kombi (project) 1921 Nash Hot Rod (future project)

    • View build HERE
    Member since: February 17, 2015
    Posts: 5 777
    Supporter

    I personally think all the LSA configs are a bit ugly.  If its looks your going for imo they aren’t the way to go, but then that may not be an issue.

    #17664
    Profile photo of Judge1 Frazer
    Judge1 Frazer
    Participant
    Member since: February 5, 2016
    Posts: 775
    Supporter

    Hey all I read on another page that these motor (LSA) have three map sensors this surely can not be right , would a 3bar map sensor  be enough, if any one can give me more info would be appreciated

    also I’ve looked at custom wiring looms and they say they add diagnostic plug and oxygen sensors ,don’t the ls1 come with this wired in ???? Cheers Frazer

    #17666
    Profile photo of cava454
    cava454
    Moderator
    Member since: February 20, 2015
    Posts: 2 390
    Supporter

    Yes, 3 map sensors.

    It’s honestly easier and only slightly more expensive to stick with the FBW and go either e38 or e67 ECU.

    If you want flex fuel e38.

    #17673
    Profile photo of Slow355
    Slow355
    Participant
    Member since: March 2, 2015
    Posts: 322

    When you have 600hp and running tens with fuck all work who cares how ugly the motor is lol. LSA is definitely the way if you want to engine swap.

    munch munch ls1s for lunch
    Best 1/4 mile 13.1@105mph 60ft-1.8sec Reaction time .8 sec 0/100-4.8sec

    #17680
    Profile photo of VRSenator065
    VRSenator065
    Participant
    • Adelaide SA
    • VR Senator LSx454 1960 Kombi (project) 1921 Nash Hot Rod (future project)

    • View build HERE
    Member since: February 17, 2015
    Posts: 5 777
    Supporter

    LSx454, 600 plus HP, 600 ft/lb, NA, straight out the box.  LSA isnt the only way to go.  Not saying LSA is a bad way to go btw, just saying there are other options.

    #17682
    Profile photo of cava454
    cava454
    Moderator
    Member since: February 20, 2015
    Posts: 2 390
    Supporter

    It’s the smart way to go. Lol B-)

    #17685
    Profile photo of Slow355
    Slow355
    Participant
    Member since: March 2, 2015
    Posts: 322

    LSx454, 600 plus HP, 600 ft/lb, NA, straight out the box. LSA isnt the only way to go. Not saying LSA is a bad way to go btw, just saying there are other options.

    Yea and a few bolt on tweaks the lsa making 700hp. Like all blown/turbo stock motors, heaps left in them without going heads and cams etc

    munch munch ls1s for lunch
    Best 1/4 mile 13.1@105mph 60ft-1.8sec Reaction time .8 sec 0/100-4.8sec

    #17695
    Profile photo of VRSenator065
    VRSenator065
    Participant
    • Adelaide SA
    • VR Senator LSx454 1960 Kombi (project) 1921 Nash Hot Rod (future project)

    • View build HERE
    Member since: February 17, 2015
    Posts: 5 777
    Supporter

    LSx454, 600 plus HP, 600 ft/lb, NA, straight out the box. LSA isnt the only way to go. Not saying LSA is a bad way to go btw, just saying there are other options.

    Yea and a few bolt on tweaks the lsa making 700hp. Like all blown/turbo stock motors, heaps left in them without going heads and cams etc

    My LSx is probably making around 630ish, with a very baby cam and zero mods.  Cam change and head tickle I will be around 700 too with instant throttle response and huge low down torque and none of the complication (visual and mechanical) of FI.  It just comes down to personal preference. Both work, both are great, LSA just isn’t the only game in town.

    #17698
    Profile photo of cava454
    cava454
    Moderator
    Member since: February 20, 2015
    Posts: 2 390
    Supporter

    Each has their perks. I’ve done the NA deal and Cbf with it again. Thus why I went boosted.

    I want to make 700rwhp not Fly.

    #17700
    Profile photo of VRSenator065
    VRSenator065
    Participant
    • Adelaide SA
    • VR Senator LSx454 1960 Kombi (project) 1921 Nash Hot Rod (future project)

    • View build HERE
    Member since: February 17, 2015
    Posts: 5 777
    Supporter

    For sure, no right/wrong way.  My eventual end goal is/was 1,000hp fly NA, but that is maybe 750 + 250 hp nos which is sorta a bit like chemical fi.  Not sure what that would equate too at the wheels.  So what sort of numbers on the 1/4 would that theoretically give you Cav, low 9’s?

    #17704
    Profile photo of cava454
    cava454
    Moderator
    Member since: February 20, 2015
    Posts: 2 390
    Supporter

    Ive never been one for RWKW. I just want it to run 145mph. Hopefully around 9.5-9.8

    so I prob shouldn’t of said 700rwhp lol.

    • This reply was modified 8 years, 4 months ago by Profile photo of cava454 cava454.
    #17715
    Profile photo of Slow355
    Slow355
    Participant
    Member since: March 2, 2015
    Posts: 322

    But the way cav eats will probably be more like 10 flat with his lard ass in it

    munch munch ls1s for lunch
    Best 1/4 mile 13.1@105mph 60ft-1.8sec Reaction time .8 sec 0/100-4.8sec

Viewing 20 posts - 21 through 40 (of 61 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.